ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the value of UF‐1000i urinary sediment analyzer and phase‐contrast microscopy in identify source of hematuria .Methods A total of 98 patients diagnosed as hematuresis from December 2013 to May 2014 in the Affiliated Hospital of Putian Institute were enrolled in this study .Both the urinary sediment examination and phase‐contrast microscopy ex‐amination were conducted on the patients .According to clinical diagnosis results ,the sensitivity and specificity of the two methods were calculated and compared .Results The sensitivity of UF‐1000i urinary sediment analyzer (95 .3% ) was higher than that of the phase contrast microscope (81 .9% ) ,the difference was significant (P < 0 .05) ,while the specificity of phase contrast microscope (92 .3% ) was higher than that of UF‐1000i urinary sediment analyzer(89 .2% ) ,the difference was significant(P < 0 .05) .Conclu‐sion Combining application of UF‐1000i urinary sediment analyzer and phase contrast microscope has great clinical significance .
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the effects of hemodialysis f on immune function of patients with end-stage nephropathy associated HBV virus infection.Methods:50 cases of patients with end-stage nephropathy associated HBV virus infection from June 2011 to June 2013 were randomly selected as observation group.50 cases of patients with end-stage renal disease as the control group.Patients in control group and observation group were treated with continuous hemodialysis therapy .24 h urinary protein ,serum al-bumin,blood urea nitrogen and creatinine in control group and observation group before and after treatment were analyzed .The regulatory T lymphocyte ,the CD8+T lymphocytes,perforin and granzyme B in peripheral blood in control group and observation group before and after treatment were analyzed by flow cytometry.Results:After dialysis treatment ,clinical symptoms and laboratory indexes of the two groups were significantly improved ( P0.05 ).There was no significant change of immune function in the control group before and after treatment ( P>0.05 ).But the ratio of Treg cells and CD 8+T lymphocyte in observation group after treatment were sig-nificantly increased than that of before treatment ( P<0.05 ).Before treatment ,the active molecule perforin and granzyme B expression rate of T cells in the peripheral blood of observation group were higher than the control group ( P<0.05 ).After treatment ,Treg cell and CD8+T lymphocyte ratio were significantly decreased as well as perforin and granzyme B expression rate ( P<0.05 ).Conclusion:Compared with control group ,hemodialysis can significantly improve the immune function of the patients with end -stage nephropathy as-sociated HBV virus infection.
ABSTRACT
Infection control is important in quality management of blood purification center. Practice of Continuous Quality Improvement in infection control improves patients' living quality, and it is worth proceeding and generalization.
ABSTRACT
Background and purpose:It is important to control acute pain after gynecological oncologic surgery effectively.This study was to compare the clinical effects of butorphanol and flurbiprofen axetil(FA) combined with sufentanil on patient controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA) after surgery.Methods:Forty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients scheduled for elective gynecological oncologic surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups of twenty each,butorphanol group(Group B) and flurbiprofen axetil(FA) combined with sufentanil group(Group FS).After induction Group B received a loading dose of butorphanol 1 mg,and Group FS received that of FA 50 mg.Before the operation was over,Group B received intravenous infusion of butorphanol 13 mg in 100 mL saline,whereas Group FS received that of FA 150 mg combined with sufentanil 200 ?g in 100 mL saline.In the postoperative period,visual analogue scale(VAS),Ramsay sedative scores and side effects were recorded at 6,12,24 and 48 h.Results:There were not any signifi cant differences in VAS and the demanding times for supplemental bolus between the two groups.All VAS were below 4.Ramsay sedative scores of Group B before 12 h were signifi cantly higher than those in group FS(P0.05).The incidence of nausea and vomiting in Group FS was signif icantly higher than that in Group B(P
ABSTRACT
Child A.The concentration of CGRP varied positively with the diameter of portal vein(r=0.60,P